Wednesday, June 9, 2010

Trisha Brown at Dia Beacon/ The Brooklyn Rail

Both performances were supposed to be the same. They were scheduled to take place a little over an hour away from the city in Beacon, and we definitely missed the 1pm showing. No matter. A late start was corrected with a dangerous bit of speeding on the highway and by the time the 3pm audience was shuffled into the gallery space whereGroup Primary Accumulation with Movers (1973) was already occurring, we—minutes late, last in line—were among them. In the presence of Trisha Brown’s understated early work and DiaBeacon’s wealth of natural light, time changed speed and space got bigger. Rushing itself suddenly seemed a ridiculous oddity.

Four dancers performed Brown’s repetitive series of movements while laying on their backs behind the waist-high glass walls that separate gallery visitors from Michael Heizer’s sculpture, North, East, South, West, the “set” for the first work. Bent knees opened and closed, heads raised up to look between legs, hands lifted to the side of heads as if tucking hair behind ears—and then again, and then again. Four other dancers, dressed in simple white pants and tops, the same as those going through the “Primary Accumulation” motions together, periodically repositioned their constantly moving counterparts.

The dancers were literally lifted up and placed back down again in different locations around Heizer’s permanent work. From behind a glass guardrail, his “negative” sculpture is not entirely visible because it’s made up of 20-foot deep three-dimensionally shaped holes in the floor, lined with weathering steel. The dancers, who are entirely visible, engage with the sculpture beyond the audience’s ability to completely grasp it due to the distance forced by the museum’s safety measures. As experienced via Brown’s dancers—these totally absorbed specimens of primary movement—the Heizer looks a little more alive, definitely more engaging. The four dancers who play the role of movers, too, look relevant to the site; we are comforted by their watchful eyes in a way that would be lost without the minor implication of threat suggested by the glass wall separating audience from sculpture.

The first piece ends when the physical repetitions just cease to continue. The audience steps aside to let the dancers shuffle past and this is when I notice that Brown is present. She’s wearing a flowing white tunic, something Indian-inspired, age-appropriate and elegant. I assumed she was just there to watch. As we passed through Dia’s wide hallways, we were quickly ushered past essential, often stunning Minimal and Post-Minimal pieces from the museum’s collection, the perfect art-object counterparts to Brown’s early work. The next dance, Figure 8 (1974) was performed amid the 16 square plates of Walter De Maria’s Silver Meters (1976) and Gold Meters (1976-77). The stainless steel plates, embedded with a pound each of mostly-hidden solid gold and silver, are laid on the floor. They are lined up in an ocean of empty space; for the performance, eight dancers stood equally spaced out between them.

Again the dancers, especially those farther away from us in the immense, bright-white former factory space, interact more with the museum objects than the floor-seated audience. They are like a sculpture here, arms raised and curved above their heads, the sound of a ticking clock corresponding with precise but asymmetrical movements executed with just those limbs. Following Figure 8, seven of the dancers leave the space and Tamara Riewe performs the 1963 solo La Chanteuse. Her solo was over almost before it began: she said, “Oh no. Oh no,” and then fell to the side, landing on padding that another dancer made sure to secure for her.

In the John Chamberlain gallery we were supposed to see Work in Progress, a newer piece that ran during the 1pm show, but instead there was a surprise appearance by Brown. Finally up close to an audience, who was now seated in front of two of Chamberlain’s crushed cars, three female dancers improvised with Brown. What had started as a somewhat austere presentation became so much more personal at this juncture in the show. Brown’s presence was characterized by the weight of her entire career and the grace with which she continued to move. It wasn’t about stunning physical feats, though at her age the bends and leg lifts are impressive, but more about her relationship with her dances and those who dance them. At one point she kissed a forehead. Everyone smiled. The passage of time was well marked by her presence: the body’s changes and the spirit’s great consistency. Time, echoed by the On Kawara date paintings visible through an open doorway—intentionally, no doubt—passed slowly during this improvisation. Distance between people dissipated. Tears had to be wiped from cheeks.

Downstairs in the basement, Opal Loop/Cloud Installation #72503 (1980) rounded out the afternoon. Four dancers, each differently costumed, performed in front of clouds of fog that were designed by Fujiko Nakaya, a collaborator on this piece. An exercise in contrasts, the work featured dancers rarely moving in synch, a structure complemented by the rhythm of this four-part show. Newly revived, Opal Loop echoes the unexpectedly fresh feel of this overall program of Brown’s older dances in conversation with the art and architecture of Dia: Beacon.

Originally published article online HERE.

Penelope Umbrico: As Is/ The Brooklyn Rail

It would be easy to dismiss the overly explicit art historical references in Penelope Umbrico’s work as defensive; the actual material is composed of images pulled from Craigslist and eBay, so intellectual weight needs to come from somewhere, right? But that would be a knee-jerk reaction to press release language—“Judd-like” for example—that’s no worse than average. Minimalism does add context to Umbrico’s series of photographs, as does appropriation art (though the photographic series seem more directly related to Dara Birnbaum’s video art repetitions of TV images). Point is: art historical recontextualization of online advertisements isn’t such a bad technique for adding to our understanding of consumption-based representations. The aesthetic success of Umbrico’s re-representations, however, stands on much less solid—less Judd-like—ground.

Broken Sets (eBay) 2307387628_a5be280e5c.jpg, 2009–2010. Digital c-print on Fuji metallic paper. 30 × 40 inches. Edition of 5.

The majority of Umbrico’s showAs Is, on view at LMAK Projects in the Lower East Side, is made up of a series of work called “Broken Sets (eBay)” (2009-2010). It consists of cropped images of broken LCD TV screens enlarged to 30 inches by 40 inches and printed on metallic paper. The artist culled the images from ads posted by eBay sellers trying to unload televisions with broken screens to people who could use them for parts. Since the TV’s were on when the sellers shot the initial pictures, accidental digital color patterns result from the particular cracks in each screen. Despite Umbrico’s much-appreciated elucidation of the failures of technology and the beauty of the accident in this series, the pieces have a hard time functioning on their own. Alone, each seems as empty as the outdated technological hardware it presents. This is explained, at least in part, by the size of the images; in consideration of the grid formations also on view, it’s clear that each set of photographs only functions if presented as a unit. Unfortunately, the small gallery makes it hard to see more than one at a time.

“Broken Sets (eBay)” was recently on view at P.S. 1. Here, the gallery’s decision to show it with two other series—“Zenith Replacement Parts” (2009) and “Desk Trajectories (As Is)” (2010)—was a good one. “Desk Trajectories (As Is)” is composed of a grid of individually framed 8.5 by 11 black-and-white Risograph prints on paper. The blurry images show used office desks posted for sale on Craigslist and eBay. The cheap copy paper and the bad image quality are surprisingly effective means of eliciting the Minimalist aesthetic toward which Umbrico strives. Each featured desk is only a right angle or a curve when taken out of its original context, yet viewed together the old desks are also emotional and literal in a depressing, corporate, wasted-nine-to-five-life kind of way.

The grid is mirrored in “Zenith Replacement Parts,” a small series (13 inches by 13 inches overall) made up of little pictures of cardboard boxes containing eponymous objects. A playful jab at sellers who post images of cardboard boxes instead of their products, this series comes off most of all as funny. In the past, Umbrico has been very critical of consumer imagery. She has appropriated pictures, for example, from mail-order catalogues, pointing out the viewer’s projection into the image and the manipulation of desire. In “Zenith Replacement Parts” especially, and in each of these series on view, her criticism of consumerism is softened as she features the outliers and the runts of the sales game. The poor guy who wants to sell his used office desk isn’t a very effective villainous representative for the poison of unchecked consumerism. Continuity with her older work remains, however, in the viewer’s essential projection of himself into this stripped down version of monotonous online buying and selling.

Reconstructing the most ridiculous of Craigslist and eBay ads through an art historical filter is a welcome comment on the unbearable idea that this—old desks and broken TV’s—is all there is. But comments don’t stand alone in art works, and when your raw material is from consumer culture, the dance to obtain that just-right aesthetic is doubly tricky. The grids come closer to success than the larger images shown side by side.

Originally published article online HERE.